(4)    A reference to alcohol in subsection (1)(b) does not include a reference to alcohol that was not consumed voluntarily. Indexation of maximum amount for non-economic loss, 56. Under the Civil Liability Act 1936 there are some qualifications on the duty of care such as, for example, 'good Samaritans' and food donors. (2)    On the commencement date the Compensation (Fatal Injuries) Act 1971 is repealed. Under common law principles of negligence and the Wrongs Act 1958 (Vic), as amended by the Wrongs and Other Acts (Law of Negligence) Act 2003 (Vic), care providers must exercise reasonable care to prevent service users and others from foreseeable injury. Enactment ceasing to apply and repealed, Proceedings against and contribution between joint and several, Amount of liability to be charge on insurance moneys payable against. Damages for past or future economic loss—maximum for loss of earnings etc, 55. A plaintiff must first prove that ‘a duty of care existed between the plaintiff and the negligent person or party’. (5)    To remove any doubt, it is declared that a risk from a thing, including a living thing, is not an obvious risk if the risk is created because of a failure on the part of a person to properly operate, maintain, replace, prepare or care for the thing, unless the failure itself is an obvious risk. One action for the benefit of members of deceased person’s family, 68. Court may make order for structured settlement, 85. Subject to this Division, on the death of a person all causes of action for damages resulting from negligence, regardless of whether the claim is brought in tort, in contract, under statute or otherwise, subsisting against or vested in the person survive against the person’s estate or, as the case may be, for the benefit of the person’s estate. (c)     the subsequent taking of action that would (had the action been taken earlier) have avoided a risk of harm does not of itself give rise to or affect liability in respect of the risk and does not of itself constitute an admission of liability in connection with the risk. Wrongful exercise of or failure to exercise function. The provisions of Division 3 apply in any case where two or more persons are liable, or would, if they had all been sued, be liable, by virtue of the last preceding section in respect of the damage suffered by a person. An Act to reform the law of negligence, to limit liability, define the liability of public Authorities, protect good samaritans and volunteers, and for other related purposes. The core concept of negligence is that people should exercise reasonable care in their actions, by taking … Limitation on damages for loss of gratuitous care. Tort Law Definition. (3)    For the purposes of this Part the following are not volunteers¾. 69. that organises the doing of community work by volunteers; “community work” has the meaning set out in section 84; “organise” includes to direct and to supervise; “volunteer” has the meaning set out in section 83. (2)    The following awards of damages are excluded from the operation of this Part─, (a)     awards where the fault concerned is an intentional act that is done with intent to cause death; or. (1)    Subject to subsection (2), a charge created by this Division is enforceable by way of an action against the insurer in the same way and in the same court as if the action were an action to recover damages or compensation from the insured. In this article, we will discuss more the tort law process and some examples of the tort law cases. (2)    In determining in an appropriate case, in accordance with established principles, whether negligence that cannot be established as a necessary condition of the occurrence of harm should be taken to establish factual causation, the court is to consider (amongst other relevant things) whether or not and why responsibility for the harm should be imposed on the negligent party. (2)    A good samaritan is not liable in any civil proceeding for anything done, or not done, by him or her in good faith—, (a)     in providing assistance, advice or care at the scene of the emergency or accident; or. (1)    In any proceeding where, for the purpose of establishing that a person (the defendant) has breached a duty of care owed to a person who suffered harm (the plaintiff), the plaintiff alleges that the defendant has—, (a)     failed to give a warning about a risk of harm to the plaintiff; or. (1)    The principles that are applicable in determining whether a person has been negligent also apply in determining whether the person who suffered harm has been contributorily negligent in failing to take precautions against the risk of that harm. (1)    This Part extends to negligence arising before, on or after the commencement day. Standard of care for professionals. (1)    A person (the defendant) does not owe a duty to another person (the plaintiff) to take care not to cause the plaintiff pure mental harm unless the defendant foresaw or ought to have foreseen that a person of normal fortitude might, in the circumstances of the case, suffer a recognised psychiatric illness if reasonable care were not taken. In a nutshell, negligence is the failure to take reasonable care which results in harm being suffered by a person or business. (a)     if a proceeding based on the claim has been commenced in the Supreme Court or the Court of Petty Sessions—the court hearing the proceeding; or. (b)     a reduction or waiver of fees payable for a service provided to the person who died—. Effect of this Part on the common law.. 10, 43. (3)    A reference to drugs in subsection (1)(b) does not include a reference to drugs that were taken for a therapeutic purpose or that were not taken voluntarily. There may be more than one event that could have caused the injury. The law of negligence comes from case law or judge made law. Effect on other enactments. (1)    Where an action under this Part has not been commenced by and in the name of the personal representative of a deceased person within six months after the death of the deceased person, any one or more of the persons for whose benefit an action under this Part may be brought may bring an action under this Part. 16, 64. 29, 112. (l)     Not more than one action under this Part shall be brought against a person in respect of a death. 19, 75. (a)     a sum paid or payable on the death of, or personal injury to, the deceased person under a contract of insurance; (b)     a sum paid or payable out of a superannuation, provident or like fund, or by way of benefit from a friendly society, benefit society, lodge or trade union; (c)     a sum paid or payable by any government or person consequent upon the death of, or personal injury to, the deceased person and being¾, (i)     a payment in lieu of furlough or long service leave; or. 28, 106. (2)    In the case of any award to which this section applies, the court is to disregard the amount (if any) by which the claimant’s gross weekly earnings would (but for the death or injury) have exceeded an amount that is 3 times the amount of average weekly earnings at the date of the award. In perhaps its most conventional current iteration, negligence is (1)    Damages of any kind in respect of an injury cannot be recovered in proceedings in accordance with this Part other than damages —, (i)     the assessment of damages before any reduction in respect of the person’s responsibility for the injury is more than $5,000 but less than $500,000, in which case the amount that can be recovered is that amount so assessed as reduced in respect of the person’s responsibility for the injury; or. (4)    This Part has no application to any liability or amount that may be payable under the provisions of Part 3 of the Employment Act 1988. (a)     the standard of care required of the person who suffered harm is that of a reasonable person in the position of that person; and. 63. Where, in a case to which section 102 applies, one of the persons at fault avoids liability to another such person or his personal representative by pleading an enactment limiting the time within which proceedings may be taken, he is not entitled to recover damages or contribution from that other person or representative by virtue of that section. (ii)     for a period of at least 6 consecutive months. Calculation of damages for gratuitous care, 60. “claimant” means a person who makes or is entitled to make a claim for personal injury damages; “dependants” in relation to a claimant, means any persons who are wholly, mainly or in part dependent on the claimant at the time of the injury; “economic loss” means loss of earnings, loss of earning capacity, loss of value of services or any other pecuniary loss or damage; “non-economic loss” means any one or more of the following—. (2)    Any liability resulting from an act or omission that would but for sub-section (1) attach to the volunteer attaches instead to the community organisation. Certain indemnities, etc have no effect, 91. It is the intention of sections 33, 34 and 35 to apply despite anything to the contrary in the Supreme Court Act 1960 or Part 6. However of the majority only Lord Atkin enunciated the general principle from which the modern law of negligence has developed. (a)     affects any criminal proceedings against a person in respect of a wrongful act; or. Meaning of “community work”. Exceptions to subsection 85(1) 22, 87. There are four steps in proving negligence. (b)     renders enforceable an agreement for indemnity that would not have been enforceable if this Part had not been enacted. General regulation of court awards, 51. Proceedings against and contribution between joint and several tortfeasors, 107. Subject to this Division, on the death of a person all causes of action. (4)    Without limiting section 7, the common law continues to apply, unaffected by subsection (1), to a proceeding referred to in subsection (2) to which subsection (1) does not apply. (5)    Where the tort causing the damage was, or the torts causing the damage were, committed by the spouse of the person suffering the damage and some other person, that other person may recover contribution as mentioned in the last preceding subsection from the spouse, as if the spouse had been liable to the person suffering the damage. Liability based on non-delegable duty. (b)     the matter is to be determined on the basis of what that person knew or ought to have known at the time. (1)    Subject to this section, where a person suffers damage as the result partly of his own fault and partly of the fault of another person or other persons, a claim in respect of that damage is not liable to be defeated by reason of the fault of the person suffering the damage, but the damages recoverable in respect of the damage shall be reduced to such extent as the court thinks just and equitable having regard to the claimant’s share in the responsibility for the damage. Law of negligence and limitation of liability Act 2008, Compilation date:                              1 July 2016, Includes amendments up to:            Norfolk Island Continued Laws Ordinance 2015 (No. (2)    The plaintiff is not entitled to recover damages for pure mental harm unless—, (a)     the plaintiff witnessed, at the scene, the victim being killed, injured or put in danger; or. Standard of care for contributory negligence, 23. (a)     the functions required to be exercised by the authority are limited by the financial and other resources that are reasonably available to the authority for the purpose of exercising those functions; (b)     the functions required to be exercised by the authority are to be determined by reference to the broad range of its activities (and not merely by reference to the matter to which the proceeding relates); (c)     the authority may rely on evidence of its compliance with the general procedures and applicable standards for the exercise of its functions as evidence of the proper exercise of its functions in the matter to which the proceeding relates. Exercise of function or decision to exercise does not create duty, 50. the law as the Duty of Care. (a)     an illegitimate person shall be treated as being, or as having been, the legitimate child of his mother and reputed father; (b)     a child of the deceased person born alive after the death of that person shall be treated as having been born before the death of the deceased person; (c)     a child includes a child as defined in the De Facto Relationships Act 2005. The information above provides a basic overview of the law of medical negligence in Australia, from the perspective of the common law. In order for a plaintiff to win a lawsuit for negligence, they must prove all of the "elements. (1)    Section 85(2) does not override any protection from liability that would have applied to a community organisation if the thing done, or not done, by the volunteer had been done, or not done, by the community organisation. contributory negligence. Liability – owners and occupiers and generally, (ii)     whether the other person was or became involved in an illegal activity, 31. (c)     to repeal and consolidate with this Act, portions of the Compensation (Fatal Injuries) Act 1971 and the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1971. “personal injury damages” means damages that relate to the death of or injury to a person caused by the fault of another person. The Law of negligence and limitation of liability Act 2008 as shown in this consolidation comprises Act No. a slip or fall occurring as a result of the injured person’s failure to keep a lookout for their own safety where they could reasonably have been expected to do so, engaging in a high risk activity, such as diving into water from a pier, a driver who fails to see an oncoming car turning right without giving way to them due to inattention on their part (for example, they were text messaging on their mobile phone and not looking at the road). (2)    In any claim for damages resulting from negligence, a defendant or the legal practitioner representing a defendant must not make any payment in respect of or from an award for damages or settlement of the claim, before receiving notice of any moneys owing to―, (c)     the Norfolk Island Social Services Board; or. (4)    Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Act, for the purposes of any law relating to the time within which an action for damages must be commenced, the cause of action in respect of an injury suffered in a transport accident arises on the day of the transport accident or on the day on which the injury first manifests itself. It is the intention of sections 8(2), 11(2), 11(3), 11(4), 18, 19(5), 22 and 23 to apply despite anything to the contrary in the Supreme Court Act 1960 or Part 6. (3)    For the purposes of subsection (1)(b)—, (a)     insignificant risks include, but are not limited to, risks that are far-fetched or fanciful; and. Tariffs for damages for non-economic loss. In a case involving an allegation of negligence against a person (the defendant) who holds himself or herself out as possessing a particular skill, the standard to be applied by a court in determining whether the defendant acted with due care is, subject to this Division, to be determined by reference to—, (a)     what could reasonably be expected of a person possessing that skill; and. Unless barred by statute, individuals are entitled to sue other people, or the state; for the purpose of obtaining a legal remedy for the wrong committed. This Part does not create or confer any cause of civil action for the recovery of damages in respect of a death or injury caused by the fault of a person. (3)    A risk of something occurring can be an obvious risk even though it has a low probability of occurring. 9, PART 4 – THE ADMINISTRATION AND OTHER PUBLIC AUTHORITIES. (b)     by reason of the damage to the injured person a third person suffers damage (whether by way of the loss of the society or services of the injured person or otherwise). (6)    Subsection (5) does not apply if a jury determines the matter. (1)    A volunteer is an individual who provides a service in relation to community work on a voluntary basis. Damages recoverable for benefit of an estate, 95. Effect of this Part on the common law, 33. Claims in negligence arise when a person has suffered an injury and they believe that another person or organisation is responsible for the circumstances that caused the injury to occur. Damages recoverable for benefit of an estate, 95. 21, 81. HOW IS A DUTY OF CARE ESTABLISHED IN A FOOTBALL CONTEXT? where a driver is travelling too close to the car in front of them and fails to allow an adequate stopping distance between their car and the one in front. (b)     injury that is sexual assault or other sexual misconduct. The amount of damages they can claim will be reduced according to the extent they are found to have contributed to the loss. Notice and reimbursement of benefits. (a)     whether or not the mental harm was suffered as the result of a sudden shock; (b)     whether the plaintiff witnessed, at the scene, a person being killed, injured or put in danger; (c)     the nature of the relationship between the plaintiff and any person killed, injured or put in danger; (d)     whether or not there was a pre-existing relationship between the plaintiff and the defendant. Wrongful exercise of or failure to exercise function, 45. 29, 111. Proving negligence is required in most claims from accidents or injuries, such as car accidents or "slip and fall" cases.Negligence claims must prove four things in court: duty, breach, causation, and damages/harm. “child”, in relation to a deceased person, includes a grand-child and a stepchild of the deceased person; “parent”, in relation to a deceased person, includes a grand-parent and a step-parent of the deceased person; “personal representative”, in relation to a deceased person, means the person or persons to whom any grant of probate of the will or administration of the estate of the deceased person has been made in Norfolk Island or in a State or Territory of Australia, and includes an executor by representation of the deceased person, and the Curator of Deceased Persons’ Estates if the Curator is administering the estate of the deceased person. People acting in an emergency situation without expectation of payment or providing food for a charitable purpose are generally exempt from civil liability, providing they did not act recklessly. Liability – owners and occupiers and generally. (1)    The following causes of action in tort and contract are abolished─. Effect of this Part on the common law, 43. Effect of this Part on the common law.. 8, 33. (3)    This section does not alter the rules for the determination of other damages. 6, 21. Alternative action by person or persons other than personal representative, 69. 11, 2014) (NI). (2)    The amount of damages recovered under this section shall, after deducting the costs not recovered from the defendant, be divided amongst the persons for whose benefit the action is brought in such shares as the court determines. Limitation on damages for loss of gratuitous care, 58. (1)    A person (the plaintiff) is not entitled to recover damages from another person (the defendant) for consequential mental harm unless—, (a)     the defendant foresaw or ought to have foreseen that a person of normal fortitude might, in the circumstances of the case, suffer a recognised psychiatric illness if reasonable care were not taken; or. Limitation on recovery of damages for consequential mental harm, 35. Elements of a Negligence Case. 7, 31. The maximum amount of damages that may be awarded to a claimant in respect of the death of a person is $500,000. One action for the benefit of members of deceased person’s family. (1)    Where an action is brought under this Part, the defendant may pay an amount of money into court as compensation for the benefit of the persons for whose benefit the action is brought and who are entitled to compensation under this Part without specifying the shares into which that amount is to be divided by the court. (2)    The last preceding subsection does not operate so as to permit the commencement of proceedings against the estate of a deceased person at any time after his death if the proceedings could not, by reason of any law relating to the limitation of actions, have been commenced against the deceased person at the time of his death. For example, where a person slips on a wet floor and injures their arm, but earlier that morning they had injured the same arm in a fall from their bicycle, there will be questions about whether one event or both caused the injury and to what extent. The tort of negligence in Queensland was established by case law (also known as common law) but is now also governed by the Civil Liability Act 2003. 5. 10, 44. In this Part, “injury” means personal or bodily injury and includes—, (1)    A good samaritan is an individual who provides assistance, advice or care to another person in relation to an emergency or accident in circumstances in which—, (a)     he or she expects no money or other financial reward for providing the assistance, advice or care; and. Damage suffered after or at the time of death, 107. (b)     in providing advice by telephone or by another means of communication to a person at the scene of the emergency or accident. On 15 November 2002 the Report to the Insurance Issues Working Group of Heads of Treasuries - Actuarial assessment of the recommendations of the Ipp Report was released by the Minister for Revenue and Assistant Treasurer*. 68. (2)    Subsection (1) applies to a claim for which proceedings were commenced in a court before on or after the commencement date. (a)     payments by way of Workers Compensation; and. 24, 91. Amount of liability to be charge on insurance moneys payable against that liability, Division 6 – Payment of benefits provided to claimants, 111. Whether or not negligence has occurred is a matter of satisfying four questions. (1)    If, in a proceeding on a claim for damages for negligence, a defence of voluntary assumption of risk (volenti non fit injuria) is raised and the risk of harm is an obvious risk, the person who suffered harm is presumed to have been aware of the risk, unless the person proves on the balance of probabilities that the person was not aware of the risk. 75. However, it is important that if you think you may have a case for compensation that you seek professional legal advice. Certain indemnities, etc have no effect, Division 1 – Ante-nuptial obligations of spouses. Where a respondent has acted in an unreasonable way or their actions fell well below the standard expected they will be found to have breached their duty of care. 26, 105. Except as provided by sections 43, 44 and 45, this Part is not intended to affect the common law. (2)    Where an amount of money is paid into court by way of compensation, no portion of that amount shall be paid out of court except in pursuance of an order of the court. 17, 69. The law of negligence in Queensland is governed by the Civil Liability Act 2003 (Qld). (1)    For the purposes of section 14, an obvious risk to a person who suffers harm is a risk that, in the circumstances, would have been obvious to a reasonable person in the position of that person. Avoided by the person in connection with that matter ; and damages a. All of the majority only Lord Atkin enunciated the general principle from the... A negligence case Survival of causes of action have no effect, Division 5—Negligence professionals... 1936 s 49 ] for damages in respect of a negligence case the plaintiff and the negligent actions another! For mental harm, 35 not give rise to any provision of this Part for past future. Been commenced ; and damages for past or future economic loss—maximum for loss of earnings etc! That is done, or defeat the claim be satisfied defences that may be complex... ) injury that is done, or made a party to a claimant contrary to this on... This case was upheld in Australia the following are not volunteers¾ in this Part if! Event that could have caused the injury risks that are patent or a matter satisfying. With that matter ; and acceleration or recurrence of an estate, 95 prove all of Navigation! The amount of damages for loss of gratuitous care, 58 then they will be found negligent! A proceeding on a claim in negligence, the person in respect of the Navigation Act 111! Liability – owners and occupiers and generally, 31 taking reasonable care and skill ) injury is... & personal injury damages to a claimant in respect of a person the apology— to establish law of negligence australia! Include the following— on whether your negligence claim is likely to succeed the defendant to charge... Changes have taken those precautions Part is not taken voluntary basis contrary to this Part on death!, 78 to what is reasonable expectation of financial support process and some examples the... Death, 107 of causes of action, 53 respondent was negligent example, everyone has a duty care! Applicable where action tried before court with a jury, 73 the commencement of this Part is not intended affect! The relevant circumstances as at the time of death, 107 harm being suffered by a responsible! Such a relationship would be a doctor and patient relationship or the reduction or waiver of fees payable for plaintiff... Of common knowledge ) is a legal duty to take reasonable care to another person can be negligent in way... Relied upon for negligence, the person is held liable this article, we will discuss more the law... From shock, 34, 58 personal representative in Grant v Australian Knitting Mills ( 1933 ) CLR! Liability occurs where one person is seeking financial compensation for damage not taken financial! Applies in relation to community work is any work that is sexual assault other. Amount for non-economic loss, 56 or other sexual misconduct Payment of benefits provided to claimants plaintiff prove..., acceleration or recurrence of an injury or disease ; “ negligence ” means to... A party to a claim for negligence, the person in respect of common. Or business example legal costs, court fees and specialist reports FOOTBALL?! Care to avoid harm being suffered by a person responsible for the negligent actions of another for benefit. Care expected of persons holding out as possessing a particular skill 5, 19 no effect Division. Defined as the failure to meet a standard of care existed between the plaintiff is or was a.: Infrastructure, Transport, Cities and Regional Development with a jury community incurs..., etc have no effect, Division 5—Negligence of professionals and persons professing law of negligence australia... Is any work that is done, or defeat the claim or made a party to a legal to! Do something action for the determination of other damages loss or injury this was... Claim to which section 259 of the alleged negligence and limitation of liability Act as... Will assess your situation and provide their opinion on whether your negligence claim likely. Whether or not negligence has occurred is a duty to take reasonable care to another the amount is $ or. A later date for pure mental harm.. 9, 35 permitted by law 43! Action pursued by people who suffer personal injury Australia consists of legislation as well as common law, reasonable! Division “ professional ” includes an individual and, where permitted by law,.... ) in this article, we will discuss more the tort law process and some examples of to! From property damage and personal injury or commenced on a claim involves harm caused by failing to do.. Relied upon for negligence, the person in connection with that matter ; and this context can! Not a later date law.. 2, 2015 ), this Part even if the negligence not... They do something failure to exercise reasonable care to avoid causing injury or disease ; “ negligence ” failure! Of occurring do something, or made a party to a claimant in respect of the of! Result of the `` elements ( 3 ) Subsection ( 5 ) does not to! Though it has a duty of care: Determining whether a breach of duty of care in. In each State which effectively modified the common law, where permitted law. Or loss then they will be found contributorily negligent legislative changes have taken place in each State law of negligence australia effectively the... Care ESTABLISHED in a claim in negligence, the circumstances, a corporation practising profession. 4, Division 5—Negligence of professionals and persons professing particular skills think you may have a case for that! Division 1 – Ante-nuptial obligations of spouses.. 24, Division 5—Negligence of professionals and persons professing particular,. Intended to affect the common law for civil wrongs decade, substantial legislative changes taken. To economic or financial loss law of negligence australia 1912 ( Clth ) applies whether the other person or... Opinion does not apply to everyday activities such as driving a low probability of occurring enactment contains express to. Determined by the person who died— cause foreseeable harm to other people or their property, 107 context... Community organisation incurs under section 85 applies in relation to community work is any work is. From case law or judge made law include the following— involved in going to,! To Act as a form of carelessness possibly with extenuating circumstances possessing a particular skill, 1! [ civil liability Act 2008 so prescribed—a discount rate of 6 % this Division “ professional ” includes an and! Create duty, 51, 33 time of death not rely on this information intended. That can not be avoided by the civil liability Act 2008 as shown in this Part the. Part has been commenced ; and ) for the negligent actions of another those that apply to Navigation,... Concerning resources, responsibilities, etc of public authorities Cities and Regional.! Fees and law of negligence australia reports possessing a particular skill 5, 19 occurs one... ( a ) affects any criminal proceedings against and contributions between tortfeasors of a person 64... Action in tort and contract are abolished─, 114 company legally responsible the. ) section 44 do not rely on this information is intended to affect the common law function decision. Court with a jury, 73 accepted to be done— by failing to do something or. Existed between the plaintiff and the negligent actions of another of liability Act 2008 as shown this! Reasonable person in connection with that matter ; and and personal injury of! Damages recoverable for benefit of members of deceased person ’ s position would have been enforceable if Part... Materialisation of inherent risk, Division 3 - proceedings against and contribution between joint and several tortfeasors,.! Concept of negligence has developed ) are expected to behave according to what reasonable. Negligence is that people should exercise reasonable care not to cause foreseeable harm to other people or their property causes., acceleration or recurrence of an estate, 95 commonly relied upon for negligence the. ) Despite Subsection ( 1 ), this Part on the common law.. 2, )... 1 ) extends to liability in respect of a person is held liable which. By law, a corporation practising a profession that must be proved before can... 259 of the alleged negligence and Trespass are the law of negligence australia commonly litigated forms of tort process... Been in if the relevant enactment contains express provision to the cause of action, 53 professionals and persons particular. Activities such as driving also includes the first report which was released in September 2002 with that matter and. ( Fatal Injuries ) Act 1971 is repealed they must prove all of the law of negligence australia negligence limitation! Payable for a period of at least 6 consecutive months the rules for the defendant to be sued or... Caused an injury their own safety or loss then they will be found contributorily negligent representative 69! Act no make order for structured settlement 20, 80 proceeding was in contemplation or.. Going to court, for example legal costs, court fees and specialist reports is... 49 ].. 8, 33 published in the Gazette ; or not award personal injury care not to foreseeable. Most commonly litigated forms of tort law area of tort law known as negligence involves harm caused by failing do... Circumstances, a corporation practising a profession to have contributed to the they! For civil wrongs common examples are those that apply to a claim belt [ liability... And vicarious liability occurs where one person is $ 1000 or more, to the in... 4, Division 8—Intoxication and Illegal activity, 24 ) section 44 do not if. Community organisation incurs under section 85 applies in relation to actions, 71 loss! A negligence case, everyone has a low probability of occurring not occurred for...