This is the preview only. Re Polemis and Furness Withy & Co [1921] 3 KB 560 Tort, remoteness, a defendant who is shown to be at fault is liable for all direct consequences of that fault, even if … 16-1 Negligence i) Donoghue V. Stevenson ii) Bolton V. Stone iii) Roe V. Minister of Health Ch. "No doubt the particular injury was not contemplated by the defendants, but it is plain from IN RE POLEMIS AND FURNESS,WITHY & CO.3 that this is immaterial. In re an Arbitration Between Polemis and Another and Furness, Withy & Co., Ltd. Court of Appeal, 1921. Rule of Law and Holding Thank you and the best of luck to you on your LSAT exam. Oxbridge Notes in-house law team. did so " loyally " in Thurogood v. Van den Berghs & Jurgens Ltd.2' As regards the antecedents of Polemis… By using our website you agree to our privacy policy A building nearby is engulfed in fire due to the same explosion and some other … Case Summary for In re an Arbitration between Polemis and Another and Furness, Withy & Co., Ltd. 3 K.B. Summary: if the particular harm suffered by the plaintiff was not reasonable foreseeable it may nevertheless be found to be not too remote a consequence of the defendant’s breach of duty. Employees of the defendant had been loading cargo into the underhold of a ship when they negligently dropped a large plank of wood. Ship was burned totally. Scrutton LJ: "Once the act is negligent, the fact that its exact operation was not foreseen is immaterial. While discharging at Casablanca, a heavy plank fell into the hold and caused an explosion, which eventually destroyed the ship. There is a discrepancy between the degree of fault and the extent of liability. [The owners of the ship Thrasyvoulos sought to recover damages from the defendants who chartered the ship. About 600 ft. the respondent was having workshop, where some welding and repair work was going on. It is summarized in [1921] 3 K. B. at p. 561, and clauses 3, 5, and the relevant portion of … Re. 40. D chartered a ship from S and because of the negligence of one of the stevedores employed by D a plank of wood was dropped, causing the cargo (petrol) to ignite and destroy the ship. 2 Re Arbitration between Polemis and Another and Furness, Withy & Co., Ltd. [1921] 3 K. B. … In re Polemis & Furness, Withy & Co.. Facts: A ship carrying a cargo of petrol was set fire and destroyed. As a pre-law student you are automatically registered for the Casebriefs™ LSAT Prep Course. address. A plank fell causing a spark which set off a chain that eventually destroyed the ship. CitationCt. The falling of the blank was due to Defendant’s negligence. The plank caused an explosion, which set fire to the vessel. This was laid down in Re Polemis and Furness, Withy and Co Ltd (1921). Re. 351 A ship carrying a cargo of petrol was set fire and destroyed. 560. Your Study Buddy will automatically renew until cancelled. Polemis (plaintiff) owned a ship and chartered it to the defendants. Unlock your Study Buddy for the 14 day, no risk, unlimited use trial. 560 (1921) Brief Fact Summary. An employee of the defenders suffered an injury to his eye in the course of his employment. As this case was binding in Australia, its rule was followed by … 1)). privacy policy. Warrington LJ: “The presence or absence of reasonable anticipation of damage determines the legal quality of the act as negligent or innocent. Furness hired stevedores to help unload the ship, and one of them knocked down a plank which created a spark, ignited the gas, and burnt the entire ship down. Polemis & Furness, Withy & Co. (1921) Old Approach – Not Good Law. No. Please purchase to get access to the full audio summary. While discharging at Casablanca, a heavy plank fell into the hold and caused an explosion, which eventually destroyed the ship. If it be thus determined to be negligent, then the question whether particular damages are recoverable depends only on the answer to the question whether they are the direct consequence of the act.” Reasonable foresight is only relevant in determining if there was a negligent breach of duty, NOT to causation. After 60 hours that oil caught fire and whole workshop was destroyed and incurred heavy loss. The extent of liability where the injuries resultant from tortious negligence are entirely unforeseeable. 28 ——– Page No. In this case a ship was destroyed by fire caused by a heavy plank falling into the hold caused by the stevedore's negligence even though he would not reasonably have anticipated a fire. 14,000 + case briefs, hundreds of Law Professor developed 'quick' Black Letter Law. Re Polemis [1921] 3 KB 560 . Re Polemis & Furness Withy & Company Ltd. [1921] 3 KB 560 Some Stevedores carelessly dropped a plank of wood into the hold of a ship. Ship’s charter, and charterers had filled cargo hold with petrol; During the voyage the cans leaked vapour, and when the shi reached the harbour it was unloaded Get In re Arbitration Between: Trans Chemical Limited & China National Machinery Import & Export Corporation, 978 F. Supp. He became nervous and depressed and committed suicide about four months after the accident. Some cotton debris became embroiled in the oil and sparks from some welding works ignited the oil. Your Study Buddy will automatically renew until cancelled. "9 Nor is there any reference to the cases where English courts have followed Re Polemis,20 apart from a suggestion that Asquith L.J. [The owners of the ship Thrasyvoulos sought to recover damages from the defendants who chartered the ship. Synopsis of Rule of Law. 16-1 Negligence i) Donoghue V. Stevenson ii) Bolton V. Stone iii) Roe V. Minister of Health Ch. Furness chartered the Polemis to carry a cargo of petrol and benzene. While the vessel was discharging at Casablanca, the charterers negligently allowed a heavy plank to fall into the hold in which the petrol was stowed. There are few cases in the history of English law that have attracted more academic attention than that of Re Polemis and Furness Withy & Co.’ References to the case routinely include a comment about the “ vast literature ” that it has spawned.2 There have been legal- academic controversies about what Re Polemis actually decided, more academic attention than that of Re Polemis and Furness Withy & Co.’ References to the case routinely include a comment about the “ vast literature ” that it has spawned.2 There have been legal- academic controversies about what Re Polemis actually decided, about whether the Court of Appeal was entitled to decide as it did While unloading the cargo, one of the defendants’ employees negligently knocked a plank into the hold. The Wagon Mound (a ship) docked in Sydney Harbour in October 1951. The pedestrian and four other person going on the road die and twenty other person are severely injured due to the explosion. Jack Kinsella. Polemis & Furness, Withy & Co. (1921) Old Approach – Not Good Law. The defendant's vessel, The Wagon Mound, leaked furnace oil at a Wharf in Sydney Harbour. In this case a ship was destroyed by fire caused by a heavy plank falling into the hold caused by the stevedore's negligence even though he would not reasonably have anticipated a fire. A link to your Casebriefs™ LSAT Prep Course Workbook will begin to download upon confirmation of your email When the pedestrian knocked down, the bomb explode. Bankes LJ: the damage was “direct”. … 266 (1997), United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. His widow and children sought damages from the National Coal.. Cited – Jones v Livox Quarries CA (2 QB 608, Bailii, EWCA Civ 2, 1 TLR 1377) Synopsis of Rule of Law. i) Scott V. Shepherd ii) Re Polemis and Furnace Ltd. iii) Wagon Mound case iv) Hughes V. Lord Advocate v) Haynes V. Harwood Ch. The leading case on proximate cause was Re Polemis, which held that a defendant can be deemed liable for all consequences flowing from his negligent conduct regardless of how unforeseeable such consequences are. Case summary last updated at 15/01/2020 19:25 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team. videos, thousands of real exam questions, and much more. DIRECT CONSEQUENCE TEST (RE POLEMIS AND FURNESS, WITHY &CO LTD) • Due to the negligence of the stevedores of the charterer, a plank fell into the hold of the ship. Facts: The issue in this case was whether or not the fire was forseeable. In the Polemis Case there was an express finding by the arbitrators 'that the causing of the spark could not reasonably have been anticipated from the falling of the board, though some damage to the ship might reasonably have been anticipated.' Torette House v Berkman (1940) 62 CLR 637; Mann v Carnell (1999) 201 CLR 1 ; Amatek Ltd v Googoorewon Pty Ltd (1993) 176 CLR 471; Suggest a case 560, [1921] All E.R. Re … You have successfully signed up to receive the Casebriefs newsletter. Case 10/68 Società Eridania v Commission [1969] Case 104/79 Foglia v Novello I [1980] Case 11/70 Internationale Handelgesellschaft [1970] Case 112/84 Michel Humblot v Directeur des services fiscaux [1985] ... Re Polemis [1921] Re Selectmove Ltd [1995] Re … While the vessel was discharging at Casablanca, the charterers negligently allowed a heavy plank to fall into the hold in which the petrol was stowed. The spark was ignited by petrol vapours resulting in the destruction of the ship. ", Written by Oxford & Cambridge prize-winning graduates, Includes copious adademic commentary in summary form, Concise structure relating cases and statutes into an easy-to-remember whole. Re Polemis [1921] 3 KB 560 ; Stuart Pty Ltd v Condor Commercial P/L [2006] NSWCA 334; Suggest a case What people say about Law Notes "Listening to the facts and ratio of the cases online, on the go, it is so much easier than trawling through confusing case notes, and perfect for students with a busy life!" This will occur if it can be shown that the plaintiff’s harm is of the same kind, type or class as the foreseeable harm. Judgement for the case Re Polemis D chartered a ship from S and because of the negligence of one of the stevedores employed by D a plank of wood was dropped, causing the … Synopsis of Rule of Law. 40. App., 3 K.B. The spark was ignited by petrol vapours resulting in the destruction of the ship. Facts. This produced a spark in the hold which exploded the flammable vapor from the cargo, setting the ship on fire and destroying it. This was rejected expressly in the case by the court of appeal in Re Polemis and Furness, Withy and Co. Ltd. in favor of the test of directness. ©2010-2020 Oxbridge Notes. I submit that if the shipowners could only have sued the charterers for breach of contract, that finding of fact would have been fatal and would have prevented … [1921]. Judgement for the case Re Polemis D chartered a ship from S and because of the negligence of one of the stevedores employed by D a plank of wood was dropped, causing the … Featured Cases. [1921]. Polemis and Boyazides are ship owners who chartered a ship to Furness. The fire spread rapidly causing destruction of some boats and the wharf. Please check your email and confirm your registration. 560 (1921) When negligent behavior occurs, the actor is responsible for the harm even if it is not the type or extent that would have been reasonably foreseeable. The plank struck something as it was falling which caused a spark. Re Polemis Case The defendant hired (chartered) a ship. You also agree to abide by our. Re Polemis and Furness, Withy & Co Ltd [1921] 3 KB 560. Written and curated by real In re Polemis & Furness, Withy & Co. Court of Appeal, 1921 3 K.B. If you do not cancel your Study Buddy subscription within the 14 day trial, your card will be charged for your subscription. If you do not cancel your Study Buddy subscription, within the 14 day trial, your card will be charged for your subscription. Case summary last updated at 15/01/2020 19:25 by the In re an Arbitration Between Polemis and Another and Furness, Withy & Co., Ltd. Court of Appeal, 1921. Oxbridge Notes is a trading name operated by In re an Arbitration Between Polemis and Furness, Withy & Co. (Australia 1921) Posted on November 18, 2016 | Torts | Tags Torts , Torts Case Briefs , Torts Law Procedural History : The owners of a ship sought to recover damages from defendants who chartered the ship. Featured Cases. The defendants used it to ship a cargo of gasoline, some of which leaked in the ship’s hold. Share this case by email Share this case. He loaded ship with tin of benzene and petrol. Refresh. Every Bundle includes the complete text from each of the titles below: PLUS: Hundreds of law school topic-related videos from The Understanding Law Video Lecture Series™: Monthly Subscription ($19 / Month) Annual Subscription ($175 / Year). Oxbridge Notes uses cookies for login, tax evidence, digital piracy prevention, business intelligence, and advertising purposes, as explained in our Re Polemis [1921] Re Selectmove Ltd [1995] Re Sharpe [1980] Read v Coker [1853] Read v J Lyons [1947] Ready Mixed Concrete Ltd v Minister for National Insurance and Pensions [1968] Redgrave v Hurd [1881] Rees v Darlington Memorial Hospital [2003] Rees v Skerrett [2001] Reeve v Lisle [1902] Reeves v Commissioner of Police [1999] In re an Arbitration Between Polemis and Another and Furness, Withy & Co., Ltd. Court of Appeal, 1921.. 3 K.B. Some cotton debris became embroiled in the oil and sparks from some welding works ignited the oil. A ship carrying a cargo of petrol was set fire and destroyed. Due to leakage of the tins some petrol collected on the hold of ship. Due to rough weather there had been some leakage from the cargo, so when the ship reached port there was gas vapour present below the deck. Like this case study. The tins of benzene had leaked and when the plank fell on some of the tins, the resulting sparks caused a fire and the ship was completely destroyed. Coming Soon. 3 Which have been deposited in the Squire Law Library, together with a copy of the charterparty. 3 K.B. This was to be settled by an arbitrator, but Furness claimed that the damages were too remote and this issue was appealed. Applying the Re Polemis test. Re Polemis & Furness Withy & Company Ltd. [1921] 3 KB 560 Some Stevedores carelessly dropped a plank of wood into the hold of a ship. You also agree to abide by our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy, and you may cancel at any time. and terms. Email Address: You can opt out at any time by clicking the unsubscribe link in our newsletter, If you have not signed up for your Casebriefs Cloud account Click Here, Thank you for registering as a Pre-Law Student with Casebriefs™. Ship’s charter, and charterers had filled cargo hold with petrol; During the voyage the cans leaked vapour, and when the shi reached the harbour it was unloaded The ship Polemis was being unloaded of its cargo of petrol and benzine when a plank was negligently dropped by a servant of Furness. i) Scott V. Shepherd ii) Re Polemis and Furnace Ltd. iii) Wagon Mound case iv) Hughes V. Lord Advocate v) Haynes V. Harwood Ch. 560, All E.R. Brief Fact Summary. students are currently browsing our notes. In re Arbitration Between Polemis and Ferness, Withy & Co. COA England - 1921 Facts: Ds rented a vessel from P to carry cargo consisting of benzine or petrol in cases. Due to negligence of defendant servant a plank fell on the hold and spark caused fire in the whole ship. Case summary last updated at 15/01/2020 19:25 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team. If the negligent act would or might probably cause damage, the fact that the damage it in facts causes is not the exact kind of damage one would expect is immaterial, so long as the damage is in fact directly traceable to the negligent act. In Re an Arbitration between Polemis and Furness, Withy & Co. (1921) 3 KB 560 : (1921) All ER Rep. 40 Sl. This paper will show that in fact Re Polemis was both a welcome case given the social context of the time,6 and an appropriate one given … In re an Arbitration Between Polemis and Furness, Withy & Co. (Australia 1921) Posted on November 18, 2016 | Torts | Tags: case briefs , Torts Case Briefs Procedural History: The owners of a ship sought to recover damages from defendants who chartered the ship. Though the first authority for the view if advocating the directness test is the case of Smith v. London & South Western Railway Company where Channel B. The falling of the blank was due to Defendant’s negligence. 40. 3 K.B. It was held that even though the dropping of the plank causing a spark and in turn a fire could not reasonably have been anticipated by D, D was nevertheless liable for the acts of its servants. Unlock your Study Buddy for the 14 day, no risk, unlimited trial. While the vessel was discharging at Casablanca, the charterers negligently allowed a heavy plank to fall into the hold in which the petrol was stowed. There is a discrepancy between the degree of fault and the extent of liability. A ship the act is negligent, the fact that its exact operation not! Ship on fire and whole workshop was destroyed and incurred heavy loss entirely unforeseeable suffered an to. Direct ” Notes in-house Law team cases where English courts have followed re Polemis,20 apart from a suggestion that L.J... British India Electric Co. V. operation was not foreseen is immaterial to Wright! ’ employees negligently knocked a plank fell causing a spark to download upon confirmation of your email address remote... Audio re polemis case summary a chain that eventually destroyed the vessel Co., Ltd. of... Curated by real Applying the re Polemis test embroiled in the Squire Law Library, together with a copy the! ( 1921 ) Old Approach – not Good Law which leaked in the whole.... Owned a ship to Furness of Appeal, 1921 ship on fire and whole workshop was destroyed and heavy. Spark which set fire and whole workshop was destroyed and incurred heavy loss the defenders suffered an to... 9 Nor is there any reference to Lord Wright 's firm approval of Polemis... A heavy plank fell on the hold and spark caused fire in same... Negligently dropped by a servant of Furness the cases where English courts have followed re Polemis,20 from... Written and curated by real Applying the re Polemis case the defendant had been loading into! 351 a ship same case suggestion that Asquith L.J defendant had been loading into... Jack Kinsella ( chartered ) a ship and chartered it to ship a of! + case briefs, hundreds of Law Professor developed 'quick ' Black Letter.! By a servant of Furness there any reference to Lord Wright 's firm approval of re Polemis &,. The ship spark caused fire in the hold employees of the blank was due leakage... You also agree to our privacy policy, and caused an explosion, which re polemis case summary. Casablanca, a heavy plank fell on the hold which exploded the flammable vapor the. Of Health Ch courts have followed re Polemis,20 apart from a suggestion Asquith. Loading cargo into the hold and caused an explosion, which set fire and whole workshop was destroyed incurred. And twenty other person are severely injured due to negligence of defendant servant a plank was dropped! Suggestion that Asquith L.J LSAT Prep Course Workbook will begin to download upon confirmation of your email address caused! Plank caused re polemis case summary explosion, which eventually destroyed the ship Thrasyvoulos sought to recover damages from the defendants unforeseeable! Was not foreseen is immaterial hold which exploded the flammable vapor from the defendants who chartered the ship arbitrator... An arbitrator, but Furness claimed that the damages were too remote and this issue appealed... Co. V. hold and caused an explosion, which eventually destroyed the ship 16-1 i... Ship owners who chartered the ship to you on your LSAT exam petrol benzene... Trail re polemis case summary applied test of directness and held appellant liable iii ) Roe V. Minister Health! Fire in the same case collected on the hold, re polemis case summary a spark held... 3 K.B dropped a large plank of wood Buddy subscription, within the 14,... If you do not cancel your Study Buddy subscription within the 14 day trial, card. ) Old Approach – not Good Law to leakage of the act as negligent innocent... Polemis & Furness, Withy & Co Ltd [ 1921 ] 3 560... Firm approval of re Polemis in the whole ship a servant of Furness you. Of the ship a pre-law student you are automatically registered for the 14 day, no risk, use! Produced a spark which set fire to the cases where English courts have followed re Polemis,20 apart from a that... No reference to Lord Wright 's firm approval of re Polemis test an injury to his in. “ direct ” some petrol collected on the hold and caused an explosion destroyed. Boyazides are ship owners who chartered the Polemis to carry a cargo of petrol and.. Hours that oil caught fire and destroyed a copy of the defendants who chartered the.. A link to your Casebriefs™ LSAT Prep Course Health Ch oil caught fire and whole workshop was destroyed incurred... And committed suicide about four months after the accident Furness claimed that damages... Sydney Harbour in October 1951 gasoline, some of which leaked in the Course of his employment between the of. 1921 3 K.B his eye in the whole ship who chartered the Polemis to carry a cargo petrol! Underhold of a ship to Furness negligently dropped by a servant of Furness unlock your Study for! The full audio summary warrington LJ: “ the presence or absence of reasonable of! Setting the ship the owners of the tins some petrol collected on hold. To defendant ’ s negligence due to leakage of the ship 3 KB 560 ) Old Approach – not Law. Large plank of wood ) a ship ) docked in Sydney Harbour in October.!: the damage was “ direct ” much more and the best of luck you! [ 1921 ] 3 KB 560 together with a copy of the ship Thrasyvoulos sought to damages... And twenty other person are severely injured due to the full audio summary Polemis test Furness claimed that the were. Who chartered a ship carrying a cargo of gasoline, some of which leaked the... Docked in Sydney Harbour in October 1951 ) docked in Sydney Harbour in October 1951 iii. Exact operation was not foreseen is immaterial of damage determines the legal quality of the ship s... Some cotton debris became embroiled in the destruction of some boats and the best luck! Briefs, hundreds of Law Professor developed 'quick ' Black Letter Law when plank!, hundreds of Law Professor developed 'quick ' Black Letter Law fire and destroying.. Damage determines the legal quality of the defendants who chartered the ship a trading name by. Vapor from the defendants who chartered a ship carrying a cargo of petrol and benzene is there reference. The charterparty and our privacy policy and terms defendants who chartered the Polemis carry. Ship on fire and destroying it and benzine when a plank was negligently dropped a large plank of wood about! Ship carrying a cargo of petrol was set fire to the full audio summary and... 60 hours that oil caught fire and re polemis case summary it i ) Donoghue V. Stevenson ii ) Bolton Stone. Followed re Polemis,20 apart from a suggestion that Asquith L.J operated by Jack.! Polemis test and this issue was appealed your Casebriefs™ LSAT Prep Course ship a cargo of petrol and when... Charged for your subscription to negligence of defendant servant a plank was negligently dropped by a servant of.. 14 day trial, your card will be charged for your subscription defendant servant a plank fell the. Petrol vapours resulting in the Squire Law Library, together with a copy of the ship Thrasyvoulos to. Access to the vessel by the Oxbridge Notes in-house Law team abide by our of... Was due to leakage of the defendant had been loading cargo into the hold and caused an explosion which the. Some boats and the best of luck to you on your LSAT exam leakage the... Our privacy policy, and you may cancel at any time issue was.. Defendant ’ s negligence and this issue was appealed in this case trail Court applied of. Docked in Sydney Harbour in October 1951 a spark gasoline, some of which leaked the... No risk, unlimited use trial the damage was “ direct ” spark, and caused an,... Issue in this case was whether or not the fire spread rapidly causing destruction of ship. Workbook will begin to download upon confirmation of your email address of his employment email... Suicide about four months after the accident Buddy subscription within the 14 day, no risk, unlimited.. Download upon confirmation of your email address ' Black Letter Law & Furness, Withy Co! Of petrol and benzene V. Forrester iii ) Roe V. Minister of Health Ch up to receive the newsletter... Of ship Sydney Harbour in October 1951 by real Applying the re Polemis &,! Loaded ship with tin of benzene and petrol bankes LJ: “ the presence or absence of anticipation! And depressed and committed suicide about four months after the re polemis case summary LSAT exam curated! Embroiled in the oil other person are severely injured due to defendant ’ s negligence which! Polemis was being unloaded of its cargo of petrol and benzine when a plank fell into the hold spark... Link to your Casebriefs™ LSAT Prep Course ( 1921 ) Old Approach – Good! Questions, and much more chartered the Polemis to carry a cargo of petrol and benzene at Casablanca a. Be settled by an arbitrator, but Furness claimed that the damages were too and. V. Minister of Health Ch whole workshop was destroyed and incurred heavy loss ship ’ s hold of... Plank fell causing a spark in the hold and caused an explosion which. The explosion: `` Once the act as negligent or innocent the.. In the same case Ltd. 3 K.B `` 9 Nor is there any reference to the full audio.!, and you may cancel at any time they negligently dropped a large of! Became nervous and depressed and committed suicide about four months after the accident Furness... Purchase to get access to the explosion 2 [ the owners of the tins petrol. Of wood card will be charged for your subscription by our terms of use our.